The Avon
Taxpayers Association Releases it Latest Report on
EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION
2015-2016
498 Board of Education Employees/ 159 Town
Employees
(Complete
document is attached, Narrative follows)
April 16, 2015
From: The Federation of Connecticut Taxpayer
Organizations
Contact: Susan Kniep,
President
Website: http://ctact.org/
Email: fctopresident@aol.com
Telephone: 860-841-8032
Again, The
Federation of Connecticut
Taxpayer Organizations Recognizes
Flo Stahl
President of the Avon Taxpayers Association
Flo Stahl is
recognized for being an effective spokesperson and activist not only for her
taxpayer organization but for taxpayers throughout Connecticut as she garners the
necessary information to provide taxpayers with the tools they need to
determine how and where their tax dollars are being spent.
On the local level, Flo Stahl, undaunted in her quest for
transparency in government, has again led the Avon Taxpayers Association in the
successful production of their annual report on Avon
Employee Compensation for Fiscal Year 2015-2016.
Flo’s narrative on this project, which is highlighted below,
is not only thought provoking but lends insight into why property owners
throughout the State should be garnering similar information in their
towns. Among the 169 Towns in Connecticut,
approximately 80% to 90% of local property taxes are dedicated to personnel
related expenses for both Town and Board of Education employees.
The Federation has attached Flo’s report in its
entirety.
It’s timely release coincides with a report recently released by
WALLETHUB which analyzed how state and local tax rates compare to
the national median in all 50 states to include the District of Columbia. With 51 being the highest taxed state on real
estate, and 1 being the lowest, New Jersey, was ranked as the highest at 51,
Hawaii the lowest at 1, and Connecticut at 46.
Regarding automobile/vehicle taxes, Rhode Island is ranked the highest at
51. Connecticut is ranked at 47. Many states charge no taxes on registered
vehicles and are therefore listed as 1.
They include Alaska, Delaware,
District of Columbia, Florida,
George, Hawaii,
Idaho, Illinois,
Louisiana, Maryland,
New Jersey, New Mexico,
New York, North Dakota,
Ohio, Oklahoma,
Oregon, Pennsylvania,
South Dakota, Tennessee,
Texas, and Vermont.
Flo’s narrative on this year’s project follows. We have also attached the complete report on
…
TOWN OF AVON
EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION
2015-2016
As of March 2015
498 Board of Education Employees
159 Town
Employees
All material contained in this report is
public information.
About 80% of the total budget represents
negotiated salaries and benefits.
We thank the Town and Board of Education for
their help in providing this information.
*********************
Once upon a time no one dared ask their
government for a copy of a letter, a memo, a contract or a salary list. That
all changed with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) in 1967. In pre-FOIA
days, requests of this nature were considered an affront, an attack on the
integrity of public officials. Now, transparency is not only expected, it is embraced. Some municipalities even post their accounts
payable online in a program called “Open Checkbook.”
A relic of willful
obscurity that has no basis in law is the murkiness of public union
negotiations. Closed door discussions are not mandated. Transparency could
easily occur if both parties agree to it. It’s that simple. Yet we somehow
convince ourselves that secret negotiations are normal and unavoidable. [There is an important distinction between
public and private sector unions: one is basically financed by public tax
dollars and has overtones of a monopoly; the other is shaped by shareholder and
free market forces, and is not part of this inquiry.]
Unions were initially established to outlaw
child labor and protect workers from appalling working conditions. President
John F. Kennedy allowed federal employees to unionize in 1962, thus expanding
collective bargaining to the public sector. This formed the basis for today’s
public employee unions.
We are not advocating an end to collective bargaining.
We are not testing our right to interrupt or intimidate. It’s not a game of
gotcha. We are merely asking for observer status on behalf of all taxpayers
when millions of their tax dollars are being discussed, apportioned, and
committed for years to come. As with other aspects of public governance, public
union negotiations should be transparent.
Florence Stahl, President, Avon
Taxpayers Association
Tom
Mortimer, Researcher and Analyst
*********************
Benefits Available To All
Employees
MEDICAL/DENTAL INSURANCE
PAID VACATION & PERSONAL TIME
OVERTIME
TERM LIFE INSURANCE
DISABILITY INSURANCE
LONG TERM CARE INSURANCE
RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS
TUITION REIMBURSEMENT
PAID SICK LEAVE & FAMILY LEAVE
PAID HOLIDAYS
PAY FOR ACCUMULATED SICK TIME
PAY FOR ACCUMULATED VACATION TIME
For an electronic copy send request to morttj@hotmail.com
Presented by Avon Taxpayers
Association, P.O. Box 934,
Avon, CT
06
****************
The Federation extends a
sincere thank you to Flo Stahl for her many years of hard work and we look
forward to many more and the information she brings to us.
The following two previously written editorials by Flo lend
insight into what we are facing today as public employee salaries ultimately
translate to taxpayer funded public employee pensions.
Especially, as many public employee pension plans throughout
the country are grossly underfunded to include Connecticut as noted within Bad News For State Public Pension Plans -
Forbes.
Blames Public Unions For Detroit's Woes -
Courant.com.
Flo Stahl, Hartford Courant, December 05, 2013|Letter to the
editor
Detroit is like a
"Ghost of Municipal Mistakes Past, Present and Future" [Dec. 4, news,
"Detroit
Ruled Eligible For Bankruptcy
Protection"]. The result of compensation largesse enforced by statutes and
union pressure, this "Ghost" will come back to haunt every town in Connecticut.
Let's be clear
about the difference between public and private unions. The Teamsters or the
Ladies Garment Workers have little in common with public employees, especially
those earning six figures. In the absence of private sector constraints, these
employees receive benefits supported perpetually by public tax revenue.
Every municipality
wants happy, well-paid employees. After all, service matters. But as revenues
are increasingly overwhelmed by compensation agreements, this consideration
occurs at the expense of other municipal commitments. Adjustments in co-pays, sick days or other marginal components,
while giving negotiators political cover when aggregated, sound wonderful but
mean little compared to the cumulative effect of mill rate increases.
General wage increases that appear small
often obscure escalations and perks that far exceed fiscal caution.
Public unions have
come a long way since their "Tiny Tim" days and municipal
decision-makers can't hide from this "Ghost" indefinitely. Together
they must stop killing the goose that lays those golden eggs.
Florence Stahl, Avon
The writer is president of the Avon Taxpayers Association.
http://articles.courant.com/2013-12-05/news/hcrs-17798--20131204_1_ghost-public-employees-avon-taxpayers-association
************************
Let the Sunshine In!
A Request for Transparency in
Public Sector Union Contract Negotiations
By Flo Stahl,
President of the Avon Taxpayers Association, and Board Member of The Federation of Connecticut Taxpayer Organizations, March,
2012
Every year a municipality somewhere in Connecticut
implores “yes” and a public union somewhere in Connecticut declares “no.” What they are doing is negotiating ground
rules for expiring contracts and addressing the prickly question of whether
these negotiations should be open or closed. By “open” we mean allowing passive
observation by community members.
It is an intractable stalemate of their own making, since
there is no legislation, no understanding, no policy whatsoever that prohibits
the public from witnessing these negotiations. All it takes is agreement
between the parties.
At a recent negotiation session in Avon,
a union lawyer rejected the town’s request, saying “It would be a circus.” If
open negotiations are a circus, then the union would be its ring master. With
its overwhelming power, any union could extract the most stringent control in
exchange for merely allowing people in the room. Yet his statement went
unchallenged because no municipality has ever gone to the mat for open
negotiations. Unlike the occasional
binding arbitration cases regarding compensation and work rules, there is not
one instance of municipal pushback on the issue of open negotiations. And who
could blame them? It would require protracted litigation involving the State
Labor Relations Board, a dreaded binding arbitration procedure, and advocacy
for an intangible called “transparency.”
What makes the practice of closed negotiations insidious is
that it perpetuates a culture of mystery and opaqueness. This is the same
culture that is charged with producing the equivalent of a financial hammer
because we live or die by these contract decisions for years. When the secretly
negotiated contract finally does become public, its opaqueness continues with
language that almost always requires knowledge of prior provisions and terms to
make any sense of it.
The International Brotherhood of Teamsters, the United Auto
Workers of America,
or the United Farm Workers, to name a few, are
all free-market labor organizations not reliant on local property taxes for
their lifeblood. These fundamentally different, private sector unions exist in
a climate of competition-driven consumer choice, global labor variables, and even
world monetary policy. It is not a moral imperative that their negotiations be
held in the open. Municipal unions, however, are shielded from all these
pressures. They are in a special – one might say – honored, relationship with
the public they serve.
So, why the secrecy? Why the license to repeatedly reject open
sessions? One partner in this dialog must acknowledge that closed negotiations
are indefensible. It raises profound questions about the union-community
relationship and, most damaging, it reveals a cynical mindset toward the public
it serves. Let the sunshine in. It’s the right thing to do.