Back Home About Us Contact Us
Town Charters
Seniors
Federal Budget
Ethics
Hall of Shame
Education
Unions
Binding Arbitration
State - Budget
Local - Budget
Prevailing Wage
Jobs
Health Care
Referendum
Eminent Domain
Group Homes
Consortium
TABOR
Editorials
Tax Talk
Press Releases
Find Representatives
Web Sites
Media
CT Taxpayer Groups
 
Ethics
MUNICIPAL ETHICS AND CORRUPTION

OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH

 

MUNICIPAL ETHICS AND CORRUPTION

 

By: Sandra Norman-Eady, Chief Attorney

 

March 11, 2003

2003-R-0259

 

You asked for a section-by-section analysis of HB 6594, An Act Concerning Municipal Ethics, Municipal Whistleblower Protections and the Investigation of Municipal Corruption.

SUMMARY

The bill requires municipalities and special districts to establish an ethics commission and adopt the code of ethics contained in the bill. Towns (48 listed in the Blue Book) and districts that have exercised their statutory authority to establish a commission do not have to establish another but they may have to adopt the model code if its provisions are stricter than those in their existing code.

The bill extends to municipalities the whistleblower protections and procedures currently applicable to corruption, unethical practices, or law violations by state agencies.

The bill eliminates a requirement for the chief state's attorney or a state's attorney to include in any application for a grand jury to investigate allegations of municipal corruption reasons why (1) other normal investigative procedures that were tried failed or (2) normal

procedures are unlikely to succeed or are too dangerous to use. It also eliminates the grand jury panel's duty to find in these cases that other normal investigative procedures have failed, reasonably appear to be likely to fail, or appear too dangerous to try.    Continued at this website:

http://www.cga.state.ct.us/2003/rpt/2003-R-0259.htm